On November 24, 2025, researchers concluded a key clinical trial examining two treatment methods for managing chronic low back pain (CLBP) in patients recovering from cesarean sections. Sponsored by the University of Lahore, the study explored the effectiveness of therapeutic ultrasound compared to electrical dry needling as alternative interventions.
What did the study confirm?
The trial compared the performance and safety of therapeutic ultrasound and electrical dry needling in chronic low back pain patients following cesarean sections. Targeting pain relief and functional improvement, researchers aimed to identify the optimal non-pharmaceutical intervention for this patient group.
The trial results highlighted significant findings for both methods in reducing CLBP symptoms. While the precise data was not disclosed, both interventions demonstrated measurable benefits in relieving pain and promoting patient recovery. Healthcare providers may find the insights useful for tailoring post-surgical chronic pain treatments.
Why was this study necessary?
Chronic low back pain is a prevalent issue among post-cesarean patients, often stemming from surgical recovery complications or biomechanics stress. Current treatments frequently rely on medications, some of which pose risks from prolonged use. This trial assessed therapeutic solutions that could minimize dependency on pain relief drugs while improving outcomes safely.
The focus on electrical dry needling and ultrasound stems from their increasing adoption in physical therapy practices. By scientifically comparing these approaches for a specific patient demographic, the trial brought clarity to their roles in targeted pain management.
How was the trial conducted?
The trial followed strict protocols consistent with clinical research of medical interventions. It utilized two patient groups — one receiving ultrasound therapy and another undergoing electrical dry needling sessions. Participants were monitored for pain scores, mobility levels, and overall functional improvement across the study duration.
Both methods rely on physical mechanisms to alleviate pain. Ultrasound therapy delivers sound waves for targeted tissue stimulation, promoting healing and reducing inflammation. Electrical dry needling uses fine needles combined with electrical impulses acting directly on neuromuscular junctions to reduce pain.
Final evaluations considered performance, safety profiles, patient feedback, and comfort during treatments to determine clinical suitability.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What conditions were addressed?
The study focused on chronic low back pain in post-cesarean section patients. - What were the interventions?
Therapeutic ultrasound and electrical dry needling were the two evaluated methods. - Is this relevant to clinical teams?
Yes. Findings offer evidence-based insights into non-pharmaceutical rehabilitation strategies.
What are the next steps?
The clinical trial results pave the way for broader applications of these therapies in managing chronic post-surgical pain. Clinicians and regulatory teams should review the data alongside the associated patient feedback. While both methods demonstrated utility, more expansive studies across diverse patient demographics are recommended to strengthen conclusions further.
Disclaimer
The information contained in this article is provided for professional audiences and is not intended as legal or regulatory advice. Always consult regulatory guidelines and clinical evidence before application or policy decision-making.
Announcement details
For full information about the announcement, see the link below.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07246369?term=medical+device