Percuflex Ureteral Stent; Percuflex Plus Ureteral Stent; Percuflex Plus SureDrive Steerable Ureteral Stent Set; Contour Ureteral Stent; Contour SureDrive Steerable Ureteral Stent Set; Contour VL Variable Length Ureteral Stent; Contour VL SureDrive Steerable Ureteral Stent Set; Polaris Ultra Ureteral Stent; Polaris Loop Ureteral Stent; Tria Firm Ureteral Stent; Tria Soft Ureteral Stent; Percuflex Urinary Diversion Stent Set (K250824)
Description
Percuflex Ureteral Stent; Percuflex Plus Ureteral Stent; Percuflex Plus SureDrive Steerable Ureteral Stent Set; Contour Ureteral Stent; Contour SureDrive Steerable Ureteral Stent Set; Contour VL Variable Length Ureteral Stent; Contour VL SureDrive Steerable Ureteral Stent Set; Polaris Ultra Ureteral Stent; Polaris Loop Ureteral Stent; Tria Firm Ureteral Stent; Tria Soft Ureteral Stent; Percuflex Urinary Diversion Stent Set by Boston Scientific Corporation, an FDA 510(k) cleared gastroenterology, urology device.
Regulatory Information
FDA Database
View on FDA DatabaseCategories
Predicate lineage for K250824
A 510(k) clearance is granted by showing substantial equivalence to an earlier legally marketed device, called the predicate. This lineage is named in the 510(k) summary document and is not published by the FDA as a connected dataset. Percuflex Ureteral Stent; Percuflex Plus Ureteral Stent; Percuflex Plus SureDrive Steerable Ureteral Stent Set; Contour Ureteral Stent; Contour SureDrive Steerable Ureteral Stent Set; Contour VL Variable Length Ureteral Stent; Contour VL SureDrive Steerable Ureteral Stent Set; Polaris Ultra Ureteral Stent; Polaris Loop Ureteral Stent; Tria Firm Ureteral Stent; Tria Soft Ureteral Stent; Percuflex Urinary Diversion Stent Set (K250824) cites 1 predicate device and is itself cited by 0 later devices.
Predicate devices cited by this clearance
| K number | Device | Applicant | Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| K190603 | Tria Firm Ureteral Stent | Boston Scientific Corporation | 2019 |
Trace the full predicate network for K250824
A link appears here only where the predicate could be read from a published 510(k) summary. Where no summary exists or a reference cannot be resolved to a K number, no link is drawn, so a gap means unknown rather than none.